Integration with contracts and boundaries
The Developer Center supplies proposed contracts, HTTP examples and offline simulation for design discussions.
Explore by workflow
Integration quickstart
Exercise ingest → job tracking → registration → verification with synthetic data.
Read detailsAPI authentication and authorization
OAuth scopes govern API access; tenant/project and records policy still govern business authorization.
Read detailsMetadata and classification
Metadata contracts retain schema/version, file plans and source identifiers.
Read detailsWebhooks, events and recovery
Proposed asynchronous notification contracts support signatures, replay protection and controlled retries.
Read detailsConnectors and integration boundaries
Connect source/target systems while preserving authority in the correct systems.
Read detailsDevice/Edge integration
Device command contracts retain commandId, SheetID, deadlines, acknowledgements and recovery semantics.
Read detailsTest environments and go-live criteria
Offline simulation does not prove production integration.
Read detailsHTTP examples and downloads
Proposed contracts, HTTP examples and synthetic data are packaged for offline use.
Read detailsIngest packages
Submit manifests for validation and asynchronous jobs; examples use synthetic fileRefs, not actual uploads.
Read detailsRegistration and declaration
Request declaration for validated/QC packages under file plans and approval authority.
Read detailsControlled metadata updates
Create correction requests with expectedVersion/reason; do not silently edit declared records.
Read detailsProcessing jobs and status
Track asynchronous jobs and object-level errors. Tool progress is synthetic.
Read detailsRecord search
Query authorized metadata/full text. Cursors are opaque; proposed pageSize range is 1–100.
Read detailsAccess requests
Request expiring, purpose-bound access; grants follow authorized approval.
Read detailsPreservation packages
Request SIP validation and AIP creation/management under approved profiles.
Read detailsDelivery and acceptance
Record accepted sets/decisions against manifests; billing is separately reconciled.
Read detailsEvidence verification
Verify integrity against manifest/reference hashes; do not infer provenance or legal status.
Read detailsAPI Explorer — local simulator
Explore requests/responses and failure scenarios using synthetic data; no backend connection.
Read detailsFlow R routing decision
Adapter design for discussion; RECEIVED does not confirm paper arrival.
Read detailsPayment request
Design payment requests from acceptance; no payable QR is generated.
Read detailsPayment status
Illustrative confirmation is not reconciliation or invoice issuance.
Read detailsInvoice request
Proposed Trusted Billing submission; confirm schemas/provider mapping.
Read detailsInvoice status
Track asynchronous processing; no document is available while PROCESSING.
Read detailsIntegration governance
Authorize integrations and release them to production against approved contracts, certificates and tests.
Read detailsTrusted Records ecosystem
Identity, permitted shared information and signing transactions connect to records under explicit purpose and authority.
Read detailsGoPaperless SSO
Shared identity for four portals; business authority remains organization- and project-scoped.
Read detailsRAR SSO
External identity route for authorized journeys; bind the result to subject, application and session.
Read detailsRAR ShareInfo
Permitted information sharing for a stated purpose; it does not confer unrestricted citizen-data access.
Read detailsRAR RSHUB
RAR connectivity requires an official contract before establishing Trusted Records functions.
Read detailsIntegrate with contracts, states and evidence
Start from the workflow, read OpenAPI, validate schemas and rehearse failures before requesting a sandbox.
Read detailsOpenAPI and Swagger Reference
The proposed contract is rendered from one local specification; no network Try-It or real credentials.
Read detailsEnd-to-end integration workflows
Connect technical states to business decisions instead of merely listing endpoints.
Read detailsNAPAS QR and Trusted Billing
Integration design separates payment confirmation, reconciliation and invoice issuance.
Read detailsReliability, concurrency and recovery
Retry design follows the side effect rather than repeating every request blindly.
Read detailsErrors and next actions
A consistent error envelope guides recovery without disclosing sensitive data.
Read detailsVersioning, changelog and deprecation
TR API 1.1.0-proposed · OpenAPI 3.1.1 · no released API in this package.
Read detailsLTANS and evidence-preservation integration
The Records–provider boundary covers validation, profiles, receipts, status and export. Website contracts are design proposals, not Mobile-ID LTANS APIs.
Read detailsService Playground — task-based experience
Exercise a records workflow with forms, requests/responses and a timeline. Use synthetic data in offline simulation or a local HTTP mock.
Read detailsStart with a verifiable scope.
Agree record classes, quality criteria, permissions and evidence before scaling.
Plan assessment