Who executes and who decides?
Project observers track progress; authorized users access records; acceptance approvers confirm accepted portions. Ownership does not replace an explicit access decision.
Track service delivery, inspect results, request corrections and accept portions; receive records with metadata and handover evidence.
Project observers track progress; authorized users access records; acceptance approvers confirm accepted portions. Ownership does not replace an explicit access decision.
Acceptance decisions, outstanding-item lists, delivery receipts and cost reconciliation. Partial acceptance does not close the entire project.
Reference journey for business review; the website does not process records or connect devices.
CUS sends quality feedback to DIG, requests governed access from GOV and engages ADM for accounts or support.
Owners inspect progress, quality and provenance before accepting outputs.
Read detailsAccept against manifests/evidence; disputed items remain separate from accepted quantities.
Read detailsPlace customers in the correct organization/project and recheck identity before high-risk actions.
Read detailsLet owners reconcile charges with accepted quantities and agreed billing rules.
Read detailsPhased, deposit, project or recurring arrangements are contractual. Separate scanned, QC-approved, accepted and billable volumes; retries/rescans/provider faults do not automatically create charges. Partial acceptance sends only approved items to reconciliation. No approved price list or invoice-issuance time is supplied.
Integration design separates payment confirmation, reconciliation and invoice issuance.
Read detailsDesign payment requests from acceptance; no payable QR is generated.
Read detailsProposed Trusted Billing submission; confirm schemas/provider mapping.
Read detailssynthetic-dossier-001 • Reference journey, not a real record
Paper–image discrepancies remain under review; failed QC requires correction; missing permissions deny access; partial acceptance retains outstanding items; invoice failure does not reverse payment confirmation.
DIG retains QC and sheet–image mappings. GOV selects profiles and registers/reviews evidence. ADM manages connectors, failed jobs and audits within authority. CUS sees permitted statuses and delivery packages. New LTANS content is a reference design rather than a released product screen.
Connect records lineage to Mobile-ID’s published LTANS capability; agree the Records configuration in a contract and profile.
Read detailsExercise a records workflow with forms, requests/responses and a timeline. Use synthetic data in offline simulation or a local HTTP mock.
Read detailsCheck synthetic-package hashes before delivery; distinguish byte integrity from authenticity, signatures and legal status.
Read detailsStage-level progress; pending customer responses; QC results; packages awaiting acceptance; support requests and costs using agreed units.
Place customers in the correct organization/project and recheck identity before high-risk actions.
Read detailsOwners inspect progress, quality and provenance before accepting outputs.
Read detailsAccept against manifests/evidence; disputed items remain separate from accepted quantities.
Read detailsLet owners reconcile charges with accepted quantities and agreed billing rules.
Read detailsCustomers track requests and authorize the scope/duration of support access.
Read detailsConnect paper and born-digital records through persistent identifiers, policies and evidence.
Read detailsExercise ingest → job tracking → registration → verification with synthetic data.
Read detailsEach evidence type answers a different question; hashes, timestamps and approvals are not interchangeable.
Read detailsAgree record classes, quality criteria, permissions and evidence before scaling.
Plan assessment